During the embryonic stage of brain development, some neurons and synapses form properly and connect, but others don’t, causing some parts and pieces to be discarded. This leaves behind dead or dying cells and requires the central nervous system to employ a type of cleanup crew.

Microglial cells take on that challenge, “ingesting” the waste, and are therefore critical for brain development. However, scientists lack a full understanding of how they populate the brain. A recent paper in Nature Neuroscience demonstrated how lymphatics — which remove waste from the rest of the body — are also associated with microglia and brain development in zebrafish.

“Microglia, we know, are born outside of the brain but must somehow get inside the brain during development, which is called colonization,” said the senior author. “We know that in humans this colonization is present by at least four weeks of gestation, and we went into this study with the idea of how we can find the pioneer microglia, and found the interplay between lymphatics and microglial development.”

In studies of both mice and zebrafish, scientists had learned that the precursors of microglia are formed in the yolk sacs, but they suspected there were other sources of these precursors. Using time-lapse imaging, researchers in the lab showed there were microglia-like cells, which express a gene called mrc1a+, that began populating the zebrafish brain within one day of brain formation. This was much earlier than expected.

More imaging revealed the precursor cells containing the mrc1a+ gene were migrating from lymphatics that surround the brain. When researchers disrupted the lymphatic cells, they noticed the number of microglia precursor cells was reduced.

“We discovered that if we disrupt the lymphatics, we screw up the colonization of microglia,” said the author.

The team also noticed that the precursor cells that required the lymphatics were the ones that responded when the forming brains sustained a developmental injury.

“Understanding basic science is really important, but this is an example of where we were actually trying to go after one thing and ended up at something completely different,” the author said.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-022-01091-9