Developing blood cells are caught in tugs of war between competing gene regulatory networks before finally deciding what type of cell to become, according to a study published in Nature.
Researchers report that as developing blood cells are triggered by a multitude of genetic signals firing on and off, they are pulled back and forth in fluctuating multi-lineage states before finally becoming specific cell types. Although the scientists still don't understand exactly what ques the cells to an eventual fate, their work suggests that competing gene networks induce dynamic instability, resulting in mixed-lineage states that are necessary to prime newly forming cells for that decision.
"It is somewhat chaotic but from that chaos results order. It's a finding that helps us address a fundamental question of developmental biology - what are the nature of the intermediate states and the networks of regulatory genes that underlie cell-type specification," said co-author.
Although the findings require extensive additional study to better understand the back-and-forth nature of this genetic process, the research may eventually provide new insights into developmental miscues that cause disease, according to another co-author and Investigator.
"How do blood cells know to become neutrophils or monocytes?" co-author asked. "Two thirds of your bone marrow is taken up with this activity and the number of cells has to be exquisitely balanced. Too many or too few of either can kill you."
In the current study the research team looked specifically at the formation of neutrophil and monocyte (macrophage) blood cells - critical components of the immune system. The researchers studied mouse cells as they developed in a natural state using a new and rapidly expanding technology called single-cell RNA sequencing - which identifies the genetic expression programs of individual cells and their presumptive regulators.
The authors blended laboratory biology with a new bioinformatics computer program (ICGS). ICGS takes the additional step of giving researchers an intuitive platform that can process and analyze all of the sequencing and biological data to identify the various transitioning or shifting genomic and cellular states of cells - in this instance developing blood cells.
Prior to the current study it already had been proposed that neutrophil and macrophage blood cells result from a bi-stable gene regulatory network (one that can manifest either of two stable states). But the different cellular transition states and underlying molecular dynamics of development have remained unknown.
Repeatedly working back and forth between laboratory biology and computational analysis, authors of the current paper say their analysis of developing blood cells captured a prevalent mixed-lineage intermediate. These intermediates expressed a combination of genes including those typical of stem cells that can give rise to all blood cell types as well as some genes that are specific for red blood cells, platelets, macrophages and neutrophils. This seemed to reflect competing genetic programs.
The research team also found the developing cells moving through a rare state where they encountered turbulence termed "dynamic instability." This was seen to be caused by two counteracting myeloid gene regulatory networks. Two key components of the counteracting gene networks were Irf8 and Gfi1, genes that are involved in blood cell formation. Both genes encode transcription factors, which means that their protein product controls what genetic information is used in the formation of a cell. When Irf8 and Gfi1 were eliminated from the picture, researchers showed that the rare cells could be trapped in an intermediate state.
As they continue their research, the authors want a clearer understanding of what finally causes cells in intermediate states of dynamic instability to assume specific fates. They suggest that the influence of two simultaneous and counteracting gene networks generates internal oscillations that are eventually stabilized by unknown mechanisms to generate one of two different cell fates.
Latest News
Which of the two DNA strand…
By newseditor
Posted 16 Jun
Microglia depletion prevent…
By newseditor
Posted 16 Jun
Colorectal cancer stem cell…
By newseditor
Posted 16 Jun
Paranoia in the brain
By newseditor
Posted 16 Jun
In-vitro 3D culture of func…
By newseditor
Posted 15 Jun
Other Top Stories
How one of the X chromosomes in female embryonic stem cells is sile…
Read more
Thalamus inhibition in adolescence linked to long-lasting cortical…
Read more
Gene-edited tomatoes could be a new source of vitamin D
Read more
Brain mechanism tied to age-related memory loss
Read more
No evidence of structural brain change with short-term mindfulness…
Read more
Protocols
Bioengineered human colon o…
By newseditor
Posted 14 Jun
Development of an efficient…
By newseditor
Posted 12 Jun
A co-culture system of macr…
By newseditor
Posted 10 Jun
Analysis of 3D pathology sa…
By newseditor
Posted 08 Jun
Long-term expandable mouse…
By newseditor
Posted 07 Jun
Publications
Pathways for macrophage upt…
By newseditor
Posted 16 Jun
Common and distinct neural…
By newseditor
Posted 16 Jun
Strand-resolved mutagenicit…
By newseditor
Posted 16 Jun
Innate-like T cells in live…
By newseditor
Posted 16 Jun
Membrane to cortex attachme…
By newseditor
Posted 16 Jun
Presentations
Myelin plasticity in the ve…
By newseditor
Posted 10 Jun
Hydrogels in Drug Delivery
By newseditor
Posted 12 Apr
Lipids
By newseditor
Posted 31 Dec
Cell biology of carbohydrat…
By newseditor
Posted 29 Nov
RNA interference (RNAi)
By newseditor
Posted 23 Oct
Posters
A chemical biology/modular…
By newseditor
Posted 22 Aug
Single-molecule covalent ma…
By newseditor
Posted 04 Jul
ASCO-2020-HEALTH SERVICES R…
By newseditor
Posted 23 Mar
ASCO-2020-HEAD AND NECK CANCER
By newseditor
Posted 23 Mar
ASCO-2020-GENITOURINARY CAN…
By newseditor
Posted 23 Mar