A team of dentists confirmed that a change in the dominant side of chewing is a reason for the early deterioration of dental implants. Such a change makes it more difficult for a patient to get accustomed to an implant and can lead to bone tissue abnormalities. The discovery can help dentists plan the recovery process after implantation surgeries. The results of the study were published in the European Journal of Dentistry.
Every year, around 2 mln dental implants with fixed dentures attached to them are installed all over the world. An implant is an effective way to restore a deformed or lost tooth without negatively affecting a patient's quality of life. Modern-day dental implants, usually made of titanium, are durable and quick to take in the bone tissue of a jaw. The only issue with them is their early deterioration in 4-5% of patients. Such deterioration is caused by microdamage that occurs when the load on the implant is calculated incorrectly before the surgery. Excessive load affects the junction between the metal and the bone, letting the bacteria in under the implant and causing inflammation. A team of dentists suggested that additional load on the implant might occur when a patient changes the dominant side of chewing in the first months after the surgery.
Most people don't chew symmetrically on both sides of the jaw but have a dominant side that accounts for up to 75% of chewing movements. However, such a side can be changed, for example, because of a sore tooth. It usually takes a patient 3 to 4 months to get accustomed to a dental implant and during this time the type of chewing and the load on the teeth can change. As a result, after the surgery, a patient can switch to a different side of chewing, and load calculations from before the surgery can become invalid. Until recently, the effect of this dramatic change in chewing habits on the state of dential implants remained understudied.
The team monitored the course of rehabilitation of 64 patients with dental implants. The participants of the study were adults with implants installed only on one side of the jaw. Surgeries on both sides of the jaw were not included in the study as they would not allow for measuring the effect of dominant chewing side change. The team took X-ray images of the participants' teeth, measured the strength of their chewing muscles, and in some cases took CT images of the jaws. All these operations were conducted once before the surgery and twice within a year after it. To analyze the results of the treatment, the team asked the participants to fill in questionnaires.
40 patients (62.5%) reported changes in the dominant side of chewing after the surgery. According to the dentists, this might have happened because the patients returned to the chewing patterns they had been used to earlier, before losing a tooth. Having compared this group with the rest of the patients that reported no changes in their chewing habits, the team found out that a change of the dominant side of chewing leads to more bone tissue formation pathologies. In 4 patients with changed chewing habits, the first signs of issue deterioration around the implant were visible in X-ray images. As for the second group, these signs were identified in only one participant. Six months after the surgery the patients that changed their dominant side of chewing felt 22% less adapted to the implants than the patients with no changes in their chewing patterns.
"A change in the dominant side of chewing is an important factor in one's adaptation to dental implants. According to our study, it can also be the reason for pathological processes, eventually leading to the loss of an implant. Dentists need to be aware of the prevalence of such changes, consider them when developing postsurgical rehabilitation plants, and look for their signs during regular checkups," said the author.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/s-0040-1715551
http://sciencemission.com/site/index.php?page=news&type=view&id=publications%2Fchange-in-the-dominant&filter=22
Chewing habits determine early deterioration of dental implants
- 733 views
- Added
Edited
Latest News
Citrullination is a key pla…
By newseditor
Posted 14 Sep
Senolytic therapy clinical…
By newseditor
Posted 14 Sep
Genetic tools probe microbi…
By newseditor
Posted 13 Sep
A secret passage for mutant…
By newseditor
Posted 11 Sep
Specialized T cells in the…
By newseditor
Posted 10 Sep
Other Top Stories
Dual role of stress-inducible metabolic regulators
Read more
Protein 'talks' to wrong partners in cystic fibrosis
Read more
Role of GAPDH in glucose starvation induced autophagy
Read more
Branched-chain amino acids extend life span
Read more
Enzyme replacement therapy prevents vascular calcification
Read more
Protocols
Genetic manipulation of Pat…
By newseditor
Posted 13 Sep
Single-nucleus RNA sequenci…
By newseditor
Posted 08 Sep
Engineering RNA export for…
By newseditor
Posted 25 Aug
ATP production from electri…
By newseditor
Posted 21 Aug
Labeling PIEZO2 activity in…
By newseditor
Posted 20 Aug
Publications
Timing of lifespan influenc…
By newseditor
Posted 16 Sep
Transformer-based biomarker…
By newseditor
Posted 16 Sep
Somatic variants of MAP3K3…
By newseditor
Posted 16 Sep
The NLRP3 inflammasome and…
By newseditor
Posted 15 Sep
Targeting the metabolism of…
By newseditor
Posted 15 Sep
Presentations
Hydrogels in Drug Delivery
By newseditor
Posted 12 Apr
Lipids
By newseditor
Posted 31 Dec
Cell biology of carbohydrat…
By newseditor
Posted 29 Nov
RNA interference (RNAi)
By newseditor
Posted 23 Oct
RNA structure and functions
By newseditor
Posted 19 Oct
Posters
A chemical biology/modular…
By newseditor
Posted 22 Aug
Single-molecule covalent ma…
By newseditor
Posted 04 Jul
ASCO-2020-HEALTH SERVICES R…
By newseditor
Posted 23 Mar
ASCO-2020-HEAD AND NECK CANCER
By newseditor
Posted 23 Mar
ASCO-2020-GENITOURINARY CAN…
By newseditor
Posted 23 Mar