It turns out that humans aren't the only animals that fidget. In a new study published in the journal Nature Neuroscience, researchers observed that the neural activity of mice performing trained tasks indicated that they also seemed to fidget while making decisions.
The focus of the lab is on investigating the neural circuits that are connected to decision making. The starting point for this paper was looking at the neural activity all across the top part of the brain in a mouse while it was engaged in decision-making tasks. They measured the activity with wide-field imaging, using fMRI (used for mapping brain activity) for a mouse.
"You can see activity in a big part of the brain all at the same time," the senior author said. "We usually just measure neurons in one small part of the brain at a time, and don't usually get a whole big-picture view like this."
For the science community researching cognition, the new results present a major cautionary tale about discerning signals uniquely related to cognitive processes and signals related to background movements, the senior author said. Researchers will have to work to disentangle the two signals from one another, and this study provides guidelines and computational codes on how to correct for it.
The mice in lab were trained to make specific movements, like grabbing little handles to initiate a trial, and lick one way or the other to report their decisions. The scientists expected to see neural activity related to movements that had to do with handle grabbing or with licking. What they saw was that one seemingly simple task set off a symphony of electrical activity across the mouse brain. It made the team realize that they weren't thinking about decision making in a very complete way.
"This really didn't look like what we expected it to. So, we dug a little deeper and tried to figure out what was driving this activity," the senior author said.
They found that most of the activity was driven by uninstructed movements that the animal was making like hind limb movements, pupil dilations, facial movements, nose movements, and whisker movements.
"We think of all these together as making up a movement landscape. We were always aware of a few of these movements, but the landscape is turning out to be much richer than we had realized," the author said. "We thought the animals were 100 percent focused on our task, and the licking and the grabbing and the deciding. It turned out that they had their own set of priorities that involved a lot of movements of all different kinds."
The lab is still working to understand what these priorities are and how they accompany decisions. An interesting, albeit speculative, idea to come out of the study is that movements are more tightly connected to cognition than people recognized before.
"One hypothesis that we find intriguing is that in some way, maybe the movements are part of the process of thinking and deciding," the author said. "There might be this other aspect of fidgeting that people haven't really considered before, which is that it's part of how we call up that cognitive machinery. There are a lot of people who want to move when they're thinking. And for a lot of people, it seems that part of what it means for them to think is to be moving around."
The senior author thinks that to understand this link between cognition and movements better, it's worthwhile to look at animals that are genetic models of human irregularities where the amount of movement and the kind of movement are aberrant. An example is the genetic model of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Under many circumstances, people diagnosed with ADHD move a lot more.
"Maybe they need to move more because activating their cognitive machinery requires more movements compared to the average person. Or, maybe ADHD is an example of a system that is a little bit miscalibrated," the senior author said. "Many of us can rock our chair a little bit and finally concentrate deeply. Whereas people with other kinds of brains, if they want to concentrate deeply, simply rocking the chair doesn't work that well."
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-019-0502-4
Mice, like humans, fidget when deep in thought
- 1,074 views
- Added
Edited
Latest News
Father's gut microbes affec…
By newseditor
Posted 08 May
A new brain circuit in mice…
By newseditor
Posted 08 May
Mechanism of choline entry…
By newseditor
Posted 07 May
Link between UTI and breast…
By newseditor
Posted 07 May
Sleep resets brain connections
By newseditor
Posted 07 May
Other Top Stories
A non-invasive, adhesive patch to monitor blood glucose
Read more
Specific bacteria in the small intestine are crucial for fat absorp…
Read more
Variation in a gene affects how some women store fat – and ups thei…
Read more
Why alcohol, sugar lead to thirst
Read more
Why is it harder for females to gain weight?
Read more
Protocols
Single-cell adhesive profil…
By newseditor
Posted 07 May
Parasympathetic neurons der…
By newseditor
Posted 07 May
Non-invasive measurements o…
By newseditor
Posted 05 May
A validation strategy to as…
By newseditor
Posted 04 May
Generation of rat forebrain…
By newseditor
Posted 03 May
Publications
Paternal microbiome perturb…
By newseditor
Posted 08 May
Truncating NFKB1 variants c…
By newseditor
Posted 08 May
Synaptotagmin-11 facilitate…
By newseditor
Posted 08 May
Astrocytic Slc4a4 regulates…
By newseditor
Posted 08 May
Diabetic retinopathy is a c…
By newseditor
Posted 08 May
Presentations
Hydrogels in Drug Delivery
By newseditor
Posted 12 Apr
Lipids
By newseditor
Posted 31 Dec
Cell biology of carbohydrat…
By newseditor
Posted 29 Nov
RNA interference (RNAi)
By newseditor
Posted 23 Oct
RNA structure and functions
By newseditor
Posted 19 Oct
Posters
A chemical biology/modular…
By newseditor
Posted 22 Aug
Single-molecule covalent ma…
By newseditor
Posted 04 Jul
ASCO-2020-HEALTH SERVICES R…
By newseditor
Posted 23 Mar
ASCO-2020-HEAD AND NECK CANCER
By newseditor
Posted 23 Mar
ASCO-2020-GENITOURINARY CAN…
By newseditor
Posted 23 Mar